Is aristotles view on the nature of human life correct

Similarly, Aristotle holds that a well-executed project that expresses the ethical virtues will not merely be advantageous but kalon as well—for the balance it strikes is part of what makes it advantageous.

But what is not inevitable is that our early experience will be rich enough to provide an adequate basis for worthwhile ethical reflection; that is why we need to have been brought up well.

Aristotle’s Views on Slavery: Nature, Necessary and Criticism

But another part of us—feeling or emotion—has a more limited field of reasoning—and sometimes it does not even make use of it. He himself warns us that his initial statement of what happiness is should be treated as a rough outline whose details are to be filled in later a20— Aristotle's discussion of pleasure thus helps confirm his initial hypothesis that to live our lives well we must focus on one sort of good above all others: Therefore, it is necessary to determine what our function is.

So it is clear that exercising theoretical wisdom is a more important component of our ultimate goal than practical wisdom.

He even explains how happiness is different for every person, and each different type of person has a different idea of eudaimonia. Aristotle Sample essay topic, essay writing: The only goal which these things seek is to come to a rest.

Aristotle's View On The Nature Of Human Life: Is It Correct?

All of these are unimpeded activities of a natural state. Not a bit of it. Are these present in Book VI only in order to provide a contrast with practical wisdom, or is Aristotle saying that these too must be components of our goal.

A low-grade form of ethical virtue emerges in us during childhood as we are repeatedly placed in situations that call for appropriate actions and emotions; but as we rely less on others and become capable of doing more of our own thinking, we learn to develop a larger picture of human life, our deliberative skills improve, and our emotional responses are perfected.

According to Aristotle, this view of education is necessary if we are to produce a society of happy as well as productive individuals. In any case, these two works cover more or less the same ground: For, he says, the person who acts against reason does not have what is thought to be unqualified knowledge; in a way he has knowledge, but in a way does not.

Aristotle has already made it clear in his discussion of the ethical virtues that someone who is greatly honored by his community and commands large financial resources is in a position to exercise a higher order of ethical virtue than is someone who receives few honors and has little property.

The essays are ideal for those taking examinations in English Literature. Second, in the akratic, it temporarily robs reason of its full acuity, thus handicapping it as a competitor. He opined slaves as the possession of the family or, in other words, was considered the property of the master or the family.

The objection, then, is that Aristotle's doctrine of the mean, taken as a doctrine about what the ethical agent does when he deliberates, is in many cases inapplicable or unilluminating. The standard we should use in making comparisons between rival options is virtuous activity, because that has been shown to be identical to happiness.

To be adequately equipped to live a life of thought and discussion, one will need practical wisdom, temperance, justice, and the other ethical virtues. Although Aristotle is deeply indebted to Plato's moral philosophy, particularly Plato's central insight that moral thinking must be integrated with our emotions and appetites, and that the preparation for such unity of character should begin with childhood education, the systematic character of Aristotle's discussion of these themes was a remarkable innovation.

But Aristotle never calls attention to this etymology in his ethical writings, and it seems to have little influence on his thinking. One may well ask why this kind of close friendship is necessary for happiness.

It is difficult, within his framework, to show that virtuous activity towards a friend is a uniquely important good. Book VII does not say, but in Book X, Aristotle holds that the selection of pleasures is not to be made with reference to pleasure itself, but with reference to the activities they accompany.

He stated that honor is superficial because it No one had written ethical treatises before Aristotle. No one had written ethical treatises before Aristotle.

Since he says that his goal is to preserve as many of the appearances as possible b2—7it may come as a surprise that when he analyzes the conflict between reason and feeling, he arrives at the conclusion that in a way Socrates was right after all b13— Perhaps a greater difficulty can be raised if we ask how Aristotle determines which emotions are governed by the doctrine of the mean.

A Some agents, having reached a decision about what to do on a particular occasion, experience some counter-pressure brought on by an appetite for pleasure, or anger, or some other emotion; and this countervailing influence is not completely under the control of reason.

Aristotle, however, never agreed to the enslavement of prisoners of war because victory in the war does not necessarily mean intellectual superiority of the victor or the mental deficiency of the vanquished. What he must have in mind, when he says that virtue makes the goal right, is that deliberation typically proceeds from a goal that is far more specific than the goal of attaining happiness by acting virtuously.

The logic given by him was that those who were not virtuous were slaves and that it was possible to determine who is virtuous and who is not. Do I raven, do I snatch the morsels from the dish and wolf them down, impervious to the consternation of my colleagues.

Although Aristotle rejected the view that the Forms have an independent existence, he too posited Forms as key aspects of reality, albeit, the world as we encounter it in the sublunary world.

In "Nicomachean 23 February Why should we experience anger at all, or fear, or the degree of concern for wealth and honor that Aristotle commends?.

In particular, both of Aristotle’s two main philosophical projects, first, the clarification of the nature, scope and results of logical reasoning, or, more simply, dialectic, and second, setting out a coherent science of the universe, including especially life on earth, can both be seen as resulting from being a student of Plato in the Academy.

In Aristotle's ethical work, "Nicomachean Ethics," he describes human nature as having rational and irrational psyches as well as a natural drive for creating society, gaining knowledge, finding happiness and feeling connected with God. More broadly, Aristotle believed that every species, including.

In his view, human beings a nature life is a life of justice. (Boucher and Kelly,p76) Aristotle stressed that “virtue of justice belongs to the soul and a virtue is the best arrangement, character or ability of something useful or available.” (Aristotle, ) He argued that it makes human beings differentiate from other species of animals.

Theory of Human Nature – The Tripartite Structure of the Soul – [Having encountered the social self of Confucianism, the divine self of Hinduism, and the no-self of Buddhism, we come to dualism.] Plato is a dualist ; there is both immaterial mind (soul) and material body, and it is the soul that knows the forms.

Aristotle argued that the goal of human beings is happiness, and that we achieve happiness when we fulfill our function. Therefore, it is necessary to determine what our function is. I believe that Aristotle is completely correct in his reasoning of the purpose of human nature.

He even explains how happiness is different for every person, and each different type of person has a different idea of eudaimonia.

Is aristotles view on the nature of human life correct
Rated 5/5 based on 96 review
Aristotle Essay Example For Students | Artscolumbia